It's even worse when the democratic party does shit like this "knowing" a bill like this won't become law, but they still vote for it because that's what they think their backwards constituents want.
With allies like this who needs enemies? The democratic party is saying not with a dog whistle but with a bullhorn: who else are you going to vote for?
No, it's even worse than that. All but one of these Dems hold "safe" seats, where they will win regardless of their voting history.
Of course the beauty is that they are vulnerable in the primaries. They MUST be primaried, and the LGBTQ community must turn out in droves to nominate a pro-LGBTQ Dem (who will win the general election easily, because the district is "safe").
Liberty City: We Are Profoundly Disappointed By Philadelphia Senator Christine Tartaglione's Vote In Support of Senate Bill 9
SB9 is a hateful and bigoted bill that targets trans women and girls
Philadelphia – Today, the Board of the Liberty City LGBTQ Democratic Club released the following statement regarding the State Senate vote on SB 9:
"Philadelphia’s LGBTQIA+ and allied community is disgusted by the hateful State Senate vote yesterday to pass Senate Bill 9 that targets trans women and girls. We are profoundly disappointed by Philadelphia Senator Christine Tartaglione, who claims on her website that she will “protect” the LGBTQIA+ community in her legislative efforts but is now lining up with MAGA ideology. We and other aligned organizations will be looking to support alternative Democratic candidates in next year’s election due to what we are hearing from LGBTQIA+ and allied voters in the 2nd Senatorial District."
###
Liberty City LGBTQ Democratic Club is committed to building local political power for LGBTQ Philadelphians and Americans
This is so profoundly disappointing and frightening coming from my home state. What's even more so is that, while some of these senators are from more rural areas, one of them is a senator for a good swath of Philadelphia (my home), which is pretty LGBTQ+ friendly, though she does represent what's considered some of the "redder" parts of the city. Also surprising are the senators from Allentown and right outside of Allentown, because Allentown recently declared it was a safe haven for LGBTQ+ folks and gender-affirming care. Ugh, these horrible f'n politicians.
The good news in all of this is that this bill is pretty unlikely to pass, but I'm still horrified that so many Dems, especially ones from PA cities, defected to vote on this BS.
*Hugs* Equality Michigan just released a statement yesterday sharing the news and similar things are happening in Michigan too. I feel your pain. I already left Iowa, I DO NOT want to give up my career of 10 years and leave Michigan. But if I don't have a choice, I don't have a choice.
Public comment on eight anti-transgender bills in Maine is happening before the Judiciary Committee tomorrow. It is expected to be a long day. Three of the bills are about excluding transgender girls from playing sports. I will be there to give testimony on several of the bills.
Natal sex or sex by administration is a visual best guess made at birth, without comprehensively considering chromosomes, hormones, internal anatomy, or neurobiology.
Interesting,a group of highly visible biologists sent a letter to Ministry of women’s equality in the Uk.
“Biology is not binary: a letter from biologists, doctors, and other experts to Bridget Phillipson, Minister for Women and Equalities
Dear Rt Hon Bridget Phillipson,
We are writing to you in your capacity as Minister for Women and Equalities with respect to the recent EHRC interim update published on 25th April [1], in light of the recent Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman. We are writing to you to express deep concern with these developments, and to request that the government take action to restore the rights of trans & non-binary individuals to access public spaces.
The Supreme Court determined that equality act provisions with respect to single-sex spaces should be made on “biological sex”. Like “biological sex” [2], the terms “biological woman” and “biological man”, used by the EHRC and others, are often not used as scientific terms but political ones. To our knowledge, neither the court nor the EHRC has attempted to define “biological sex”.
The term “biological sex” has been used to sort all people into one of two groups. However, a strict, binary categorisation is an over-simplification. An individual’s “sex” is in fact made up of a collection of characteristics, including external genitalia, secondary sex characteristics, gonads, chromosomes, and hormones, and may be better described as bimodal [3]. Each of these traits can vary beyond two categories and may or may not coincide with other measures of sex within the same individual. Thus, a binary, immutable model of sex is not capable of capturing biological diversity present in human populations, and as a result it is an unsafe basis for policy. The medical and scientific community has accepted for some time that there is significant complexity in this area. Recently, both doctors and scientists, including Nobel laureates, have raised concerns about the impact of this oversimplification on human rights [4]. We present a brief summary to explain this below:
1) Sex characteristics observed at birth (e.g. external genitalia) are determined by a range of factors. The presence of the SRY gene on the Y chromosome usually leads to the development of male characteristics during development, though this is not always the case, such as for some individuals with Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome born with XY chromosomes [5]. Binary categorisations at birth are simplified rules and do not precisely capture biological variation such as in differences of sexual development [5, 6]. Beyond this, sex is not an immutable characteristic. Primary and secondary sex characteristics change during life and through medical interventions. As part of medical transition, many trans people undergo surgery which alters external genitalia and other bodily features, and as such anatomy is neither binary nor fixed. Although some may argue that these are just rare exceptions, these populations together are those most affected by recent developments, and therefore should not be ignored when developing policy and law. Many cisgender individuals also undergo procedures that change sex characteristics.
2) Hormones, gene expression and physiology are not binary. Gonadal steroids, such as estrogen, affect characteristics such as muscle and connective tissue [7, 8], fat distribution [9], breast and hair growth [9], bone density [10], immunity [11, 12], lung physiology [13], and more. Many trans people take hormones during medical transition, and this process is generally responsible for extensive biological changes [9]. Cells responsive to hormones, such as estrogen, will undergo changes on exposure [14] mediated by regulation of transcription [15, 16]. This means that hormones act like messages to cells, causing them to undergo changes to functionality. Hormones also induce epigenetic modification [17, 18]. This is a normal biological process which causes DNA to be chemically and structurally modified, changing the behaviour of cells and the way in which they work to coordinate bodily functions.
As a result, trans people who choose to medically transition undergo significant medically important changes that if not acknowledged can lead to clinical harm. For example, a trans woman taking oestrogen for a short period of time would experience a reduction in her haemoglobin level [19]. To use ‘birth sex’ references ranges for a blood test in this case would be inappropriate interpretation of results, with the potential for misdiagnosis, over-investigation and harm. This is also true for several other blood tests [19]. Such medical subtleties demonstrate that individualised approaches are required rather than arbitrarily imposed binaries. Similar complexities are also reflected in cisgender populations. For example, there can be significant hormonally-mediated differences in medication metabolism and response pre- and post-menopause [20].
3) Statements that biological sex is binary are only approximately accurate in the context of reproduction or fertility, which are largely irrelevant to daily life, and not a good basis for determining access to toilets or other spaces. Transgender, non-binary, and gender non-conforming cisgender people, or those who may be cisgender but perceived to fall into these groups, may be at risk of social exclusion, health inequality, harassment and violence in society due to the employment of simplistic models and biological essentialism. We are concerned that the recent ruling, and the government’s adoption of the EHRC’s interim update does not advance women’s rights, but introduces new risks for many members of our society, including cisgender women.
We call upon the government, EHRC, media, and other relevant organisations to stop the misuse of overly simplistic binary models to further political causes that may target vulnerable people. Policy and legislation in general should be informed by accurate, complete evidence and stakeholder engagement. We caution that policy based on scientific misconceptions or oversimplifications, such as the EHRC interim update, could lead to serious harm to real individuals in public spaces, medical contexts, and in many other areas of life. Although the government is not directly responsible for EHRC guidance or the recent Supreme Court ruling, we request that you take urgent action to restore the rights of trans & non-binary people to access toilets and other spaces that are essential to daily life.
Wisniewski A.B. et al. (2019). Management of 46,XY Differences/Disorders of Sex Development (DSD) Throughout Life. Endocrine Reviews, 40, 1547–1572.
Smiley, K.O. et al. (2024). Sex diversity in the 21st century: concepts, frameworks, and approaches for the future of neuroendocrinology. Hormones and behavior, 157, 105445.
Herbst, K.L. and Bhasin, S. (2004). Testosterone action on skeletal muscle. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care, 7(3), 271-277.
Chidi-Ogbolu, N. and Baar, K. (2019). Effect of estrogen on musculoskeletal performance and injury risk. Frontiers in physiology, 9, 1834.
T’Sjoen, G. et al. (2019). Endocrinology of transgender medicine. Endocrine reviews, 40(1), 97-117.
Cauley, J.A. (2015). Estrogen and bone health in men and women. Steroids, 99, 11-15.
Harding, A.T. and Heaton, N.S. (2022). The impact of estrogens and their receptors on immunity and inflammation during infection. Cancers, 14(4), 909.
Lakshmikanth, T. et al. (2024). Immune system adaptation during gender-affirming testosterone treatment. Nature, 633(8028), 155-164.
Townsend, E. A., Miller, V. M., & Prakash, Y. S. (2012). Sex differences and sex steroids in lung health and disease. Endocrine reviews, 33(1), 1-47.
Chen, P., Li, B. and Ou-Yang, L., (2022). Role of estrogen receptors in health and disease. Frontiers in endocrinology, 13, 839005.
Fuentes, N. and Silveyra, P. (2019). Estrogen receptor signaling mechanisms. Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology, 116, 135-170.
Hah, N. and Kraus, W.L. (2014). Hormone-regulated transcriptomes: lessons learned from estrogen signaling pathways in breast cancer cells. Molecular and cellular endocrinology, 382(1), 652-664.
Sklias, A. et al. (2021). Epigenetic remodelling of enhancers in response to estrogen deprivation and re-stimulation. Nucleic Acids Research, 49(17), 9738-9754.
Nolan, B. J., & Cheung, A. S. (2025). Laboratory Monitoring in Transgender and Gender-Diverse Individuals. Clinical Chemistry, hvaf001.
Brand BA, Haveman YRA, de Beer F, de Boer JN, Dazzan P, Sommer IEC. Antipsychotic medication for women with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Psychol Med. 2022 Mar;52(4):649-663.
I see this and my reaction is the same as when Barney Frank backed removing gender identity from ENDA in 2007. This is an act of betrayal, and the justifications used are just as disgusting.
And this is why I ran to be a Democratic Assembly District Delegate here in California. I really want to hold these opportunist's hands to the fire with this bullshit.
Is it possible that these senators represent very conservative districts and are only trying to protect their office. That’d be typical for too many politicians. But if they’re totally ignorant of the facts on this issue, it’d be great if they could be convinced to take a look at John Oliver’s show on this. He’s no radical; maybe some of it would make it through there…what’s a polite word for blockheads?
I’ve seen rights issues here in MA being helped to succeed by people offering real life stories to legislators rather than telling them directly to do the right thing.
Here’s the letter I sent to the senators in case it is helpful to anyone as a template:
Dear Senator:
I hope this message finds you well. Although I am not from your state or district, I nonetheless wanted to reach out because it recently came to my attention that you were among the five Democrats in the Pennsylvania State Senate who crossed party lines to vote for an anti-trans bill that would functionally single out trans women athletes, utilize unscientific definitions of “sex,” and erase intersex people in sports. As Representative Jessica Benham stated, it is always disappointing when any elected official regardless of party chooses to focus on bullying a small group of people who are just trying to live their lives. Bills like this don’t just affect athletes: they send a message to every trans kid that their identity is up for debate.
Moving forward, I would like to see you take the rights and dignity of the transgender community more seriously and vote in a way that upholds compassion for this vulnerable and oppressed group within our country. Many of us Americans care very deeply about the transgender community and are paying careful attention to which politicians support transgender rights and which, like yourself, are voting against their humanity and fundamental rights. Please do better. We are counting on you.
Thank you so much for writing this article and keeping us informed! Here is contact info I was able to find for 4 out of the 5 senators if folks want to reach out to insist they do better moving forward:
This is profoundly disappointing, but it is good that the Democratic PA House and the governorship, for now, are protective bulwarks against this type of thing.
May every elected official who pulls these kinds of amoral political backstabbings end up rotting in primary hell.
Their betrayal of the people will be noted in history.
It's even worse when the democratic party does shit like this "knowing" a bill like this won't become law, but they still vote for it because that's what they think their backwards constituents want.
With allies like this who needs enemies? The democratic party is saying not with a dog whistle but with a bullhorn: who else are you going to vote for?
No, it's even worse than that. All but one of these Dems hold "safe" seats, where they will win regardless of their voting history.
Of course the beauty is that they are vulnerable in the primaries. They MUST be primaried, and the LGBTQ community must turn out in droves to nominate a pro-LGBTQ Dem (who will win the general election easily, because the district is "safe").
And do their due diligence to hold them accountable. We don't need another Elissa Slotkin.
Liberty City: We Are Profoundly Disappointed By Philadelphia Senator Christine Tartaglione's Vote In Support of Senate Bill 9
SB9 is a hateful and bigoted bill that targets trans women and girls
Philadelphia – Today, the Board of the Liberty City LGBTQ Democratic Club released the following statement regarding the State Senate vote on SB 9:
"Philadelphia’s LGBTQIA+ and allied community is disgusted by the hateful State Senate vote yesterday to pass Senate Bill 9 that targets trans women and girls. We are profoundly disappointed by Philadelphia Senator Christine Tartaglione, who claims on her website that she will “protect” the LGBTQIA+ community in her legislative efforts but is now lining up with MAGA ideology. We and other aligned organizations will be looking to support alternative Democratic candidates in next year’s election due to what we are hearing from LGBTQIA+ and allied voters in the 2nd Senatorial District."
###
Liberty City LGBTQ Democratic Club is committed to building local political power for LGBTQ Philadelphians and Americans
This is so profoundly disappointing and frightening coming from my home state. What's even more so is that, while some of these senators are from more rural areas, one of them is a senator for a good swath of Philadelphia (my home), which is pretty LGBTQ+ friendly, though she does represent what's considered some of the "redder" parts of the city. Also surprising are the senators from Allentown and right outside of Allentown, because Allentown recently declared it was a safe haven for LGBTQ+ folks and gender-affirming care. Ugh, these horrible f'n politicians.
The good news in all of this is that this bill is pretty unlikely to pass, but I'm still horrified that so many Dems, especially ones from PA cities, defected to vote on this BS.
*Hugs* Equality Michigan just released a statement yesterday sharing the news and similar things are happening in Michigan too. I feel your pain. I already left Iowa, I DO NOT want to give up my career of 10 years and leave Michigan. But if I don't have a choice, I don't have a choice.
Public comment on eight anti-transgender bills in Maine is happening before the Judiciary Committee tomorrow. It is expected to be a long day. Three of the bills are about excluding transgender girls from playing sports. I will be there to give testimony on several of the bills.
Is this being broadcast or streamed anywhere? What time does it start?
primary them. DO NOT FORGET
Natal sex or sex by administration is a visual best guess made at birth, without comprehensively considering chromosomes, hormones, internal anatomy, or neurobiology.
Interesting,a group of highly visible biologists sent a letter to Ministry of women’s equality in the Uk.
https://trans--scribe.blogspot.com/2025/05/biology-is-not-binary-letter-from.html?m=1
“Biology is not binary: a letter from biologists, doctors, and other experts to Bridget Phillipson, Minister for Women and Equalities
Dear Rt Hon Bridget Phillipson,
We are writing to you in your capacity as Minister for Women and Equalities with respect to the recent EHRC interim update published on 25th April [1], in light of the recent Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman. We are writing to you to express deep concern with these developments, and to request that the government take action to restore the rights of trans & non-binary individuals to access public spaces.
The Supreme Court determined that equality act provisions with respect to single-sex spaces should be made on “biological sex”. Like “biological sex” [2], the terms “biological woman” and “biological man”, used by the EHRC and others, are often not used as scientific terms but political ones. To our knowledge, neither the court nor the EHRC has attempted to define “biological sex”.
The term “biological sex” has been used to sort all people into one of two groups. However, a strict, binary categorisation is an over-simplification. An individual’s “sex” is in fact made up of a collection of characteristics, including external genitalia, secondary sex characteristics, gonads, chromosomes, and hormones, and may be better described as bimodal [3]. Each of these traits can vary beyond two categories and may or may not coincide with other measures of sex within the same individual. Thus, a binary, immutable model of sex is not capable of capturing biological diversity present in human populations, and as a result it is an unsafe basis for policy. The medical and scientific community has accepted for some time that there is significant complexity in this area. Recently, both doctors and scientists, including Nobel laureates, have raised concerns about the impact of this oversimplification on human rights [4]. We present a brief summary to explain this below:
1) Sex characteristics observed at birth (e.g. external genitalia) are determined by a range of factors. The presence of the SRY gene on the Y chromosome usually leads to the development of male characteristics during development, though this is not always the case, such as for some individuals with Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome born with XY chromosomes [5]. Binary categorisations at birth are simplified rules and do not precisely capture biological variation such as in differences of sexual development [5, 6]. Beyond this, sex is not an immutable characteristic. Primary and secondary sex characteristics change during life and through medical interventions. As part of medical transition, many trans people undergo surgery which alters external genitalia and other bodily features, and as such anatomy is neither binary nor fixed. Although some may argue that these are just rare exceptions, these populations together are those most affected by recent developments, and therefore should not be ignored when developing policy and law. Many cisgender individuals also undergo procedures that change sex characteristics.
2) Hormones, gene expression and physiology are not binary. Gonadal steroids, such as estrogen, affect characteristics such as muscle and connective tissue [7, 8], fat distribution [9], breast and hair growth [9], bone density [10], immunity [11, 12], lung physiology [13], and more. Many trans people take hormones during medical transition, and this process is generally responsible for extensive biological changes [9]. Cells responsive to hormones, such as estrogen, will undergo changes on exposure [14] mediated by regulation of transcription [15, 16]. This means that hormones act like messages to cells, causing them to undergo changes to functionality. Hormones also induce epigenetic modification [17, 18]. This is a normal biological process which causes DNA to be chemically and structurally modified, changing the behaviour of cells and the way in which they work to coordinate bodily functions.
As a result, trans people who choose to medically transition undergo significant medically important changes that if not acknowledged can lead to clinical harm. For example, a trans woman taking oestrogen for a short period of time would experience a reduction in her haemoglobin level [19]. To use ‘birth sex’ references ranges for a blood test in this case would be inappropriate interpretation of results, with the potential for misdiagnosis, over-investigation and harm. This is also true for several other blood tests [19]. Such medical subtleties demonstrate that individualised approaches are required rather than arbitrarily imposed binaries. Similar complexities are also reflected in cisgender populations. For example, there can be significant hormonally-mediated differences in medication metabolism and response pre- and post-menopause [20].
3) Statements that biological sex is binary are only approximately accurate in the context of reproduction or fertility, which are largely irrelevant to daily life, and not a good basis for determining access to toilets or other spaces. Transgender, non-binary, and gender non-conforming cisgender people, or those who may be cisgender but perceived to fall into these groups, may be at risk of social exclusion, health inequality, harassment and violence in society due to the employment of simplistic models and biological essentialism. We are concerned that the recent ruling, and the government’s adoption of the EHRC’s interim update does not advance women’s rights, but introduces new risks for many members of our society, including cisgender women.
We call upon the government, EHRC, media, and other relevant organisations to stop the misuse of overly simplistic binary models to further political causes that may target vulnerable people. Policy and legislation in general should be informed by accurate, complete evidence and stakeholder engagement. We caution that policy based on scientific misconceptions or oversimplifications, such as the EHRC interim update, could lead to serious harm to real individuals in public spaces, medical contexts, and in many other areas of life. Although the government is not directly responsible for EHRC guidance or the recent Supreme Court ruling, we request that you take urgent action to restore the rights of trans & non-binary people to access toilets and other spaces that are essential to daily life.
References
An interim update on the practical implications of the UK Supreme Court judgment. 25 April 2025. https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/media-centre/interim-update-practical-implications-uk-supreme-court-judgment
van Anders et al. (2017). Biological Sex, Gender, and Public Policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4(2), 194-201.
https://bagis.co.uk/position-process-statements/
https://not-binary.org/statement/
Wisniewski A.B. et al. (2019). Management of 46,XY Differences/Disorders of Sex Development (DSD) Throughout Life. Endocrine Reviews, 40, 1547–1572.
Smiley, K.O. et al. (2024). Sex diversity in the 21st century: concepts, frameworks, and approaches for the future of neuroendocrinology. Hormones and behavior, 157, 105445.
Herbst, K.L. and Bhasin, S. (2004). Testosterone action on skeletal muscle. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care, 7(3), 271-277.
Chidi-Ogbolu, N. and Baar, K. (2019). Effect of estrogen on musculoskeletal performance and injury risk. Frontiers in physiology, 9, 1834.
T’Sjoen, G. et al. (2019). Endocrinology of transgender medicine. Endocrine reviews, 40(1), 97-117.
Cauley, J.A. (2015). Estrogen and bone health in men and women. Steroids, 99, 11-15.
Harding, A.T. and Heaton, N.S. (2022). The impact of estrogens and their receptors on immunity and inflammation during infection. Cancers, 14(4), 909.
Lakshmikanth, T. et al. (2024). Immune system adaptation during gender-affirming testosterone treatment. Nature, 633(8028), 155-164.
Townsend, E. A., Miller, V. M., & Prakash, Y. S. (2012). Sex differences and sex steroids in lung health and disease. Endocrine reviews, 33(1), 1-47.
Chen, P., Li, B. and Ou-Yang, L., (2022). Role of estrogen receptors in health and disease. Frontiers in endocrinology, 13, 839005.
Fuentes, N. and Silveyra, P. (2019). Estrogen receptor signaling mechanisms. Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology, 116, 135-170.
Hah, N. and Kraus, W.L. (2014). Hormone-regulated transcriptomes: lessons learned from estrogen signaling pathways in breast cancer cells. Molecular and cellular endocrinology, 382(1), 652-664.
Hamilton, J.P. (2011). Epigenetics: principles and practice. Digestive diseases, 29(2), 130-135.
Sklias, A. et al. (2021). Epigenetic remodelling of enhancers in response to estrogen deprivation and re-stimulation. Nucleic Acids Research, 49(17), 9738-9754.
Nolan, B. J., & Cheung, A. S. (2025). Laboratory Monitoring in Transgender and Gender-Diverse Individuals. Clinical Chemistry, hvaf001.
Brand BA, Haveman YRA, de Beer F, de Boer JN, Dazzan P, Sommer IEC. Antipsychotic medication for women with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Psychol Med. 2022 Mar;52(4):649-663.
I see this and my reaction is the same as when Barney Frank backed removing gender identity from ENDA in 2007. This is an act of betrayal, and the justifications used are just as disgusting.
The closing paragraph of this article says it all :(
Titus echoed similar sentiments. “Framing exclusion as compromise is just discrimination with better PR,” they said
And this is why I ran to be a Democratic Assembly District Delegate here in California. I really want to hold these opportunist's hands to the fire with this bullshit.
Is it possible that these senators represent very conservative districts and are only trying to protect their office. That’d be typical for too many politicians. But if they’re totally ignorant of the facts on this issue, it’d be great if they could be convinced to take a look at John Oliver’s show on this. He’s no radical; maybe some of it would make it through there…what’s a polite word for blockheads?
The article said most of them were in very safe districts and had won their elections by high margins. One of these ran unopposed
In other words, they felt a little 𝘵𝘰𝘰 safe in their seats.
I’ve seen rights issues here in MA being helped to succeed by people offering real life stories to legislators rather than telling them directly to do the right thing.
Here’s the letter I sent to the senators in case it is helpful to anyone as a template:
Dear Senator:
I hope this message finds you well. Although I am not from your state or district, I nonetheless wanted to reach out because it recently came to my attention that you were among the five Democrats in the Pennsylvania State Senate who crossed party lines to vote for an anti-trans bill that would functionally single out trans women athletes, utilize unscientific definitions of “sex,” and erase intersex people in sports. As Representative Jessica Benham stated, it is always disappointing when any elected official regardless of party chooses to focus on bullying a small group of people who are just trying to live their lives. Bills like this don’t just affect athletes: they send a message to every trans kid that their identity is up for debate.
Moving forward, I would like to see you take the rights and dignity of the transgender community more seriously and vote in a way that upholds compassion for this vulnerable and oppressed group within our country. Many of us Americans care very deeply about the transgender community and are paying careful attention to which politicians support transgender rights and which, like yourself, are voting against their humanity and fundamental rights. Please do better. We are counting on you.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
I'm imagining the original version you might have written (or imagined) before revising it to be polite. Haha
Thank you so much for writing this article and keeping us informed! Here is contact info I was able to find for 4 out of the 5 senators if folks want to reach out to insist they do better moving forward:
Senator Linda Boscola: https://senatorboscola.com/contact/
Senator Marty Flynn: https://www.senatorflynn.com/contact/
Senator Nick Miller: https://pasenatormiller.com/contact/
Senator Christine Tartaglione: https://www.senatortartaglione.com/contact
W̸i̸n̸t̸e̸r Primary Season is coming, little Quislings...
This is profoundly disappointing, but it is good that the Democratic PA House and the governorship, for now, are protective bulwarks against this type of thing.