On Monday, anti-trans groups released a set of highly editorialized and decontextualized leaks dubbed the "WPATH Files." A fact check reveals 216 errors, misrepresentations, and faulty citations.
This reminds me of the equally-bogus "Climategate" "scandal" of 14 years ago. There too, so-called "leaked" documents used misrepresented, twisted, out-of-context quotes from emails among scientists dealing with the topic to claim some sort of conspiracy to HIDE THE TRUTH double exclamation point. The topic has changed; the deceit and lies of the reactionaries have not.
One other thing to note quickly, this in reference to the study of 366 patients that had 2 with major complications: Those 2 developed interoperatively, that is, they arose during the surgery and were dealt with at the time. I mention it because I expect most people think of complications arising post-surgery.
Again, terrific work. Take a bow. In fact, take several.
Thank you for this amazing work, and for such a quick response to this outrageous propaganda. If a fraction of the journalists in the mainstream media were as diligent as you we probably wouldn't be in the middle of this horrific moral panic against queer folks to begin with.
Excellent job dear. This will be useful in fighting the resulting propaganda. I just wish more people were taught critical thinking. Too many will take it as gospel and claim that any defense is denial or a conspiracy. As a thesis, this report is a scandal itself, which would be drummed out of any university, possibly even leading to charges against the author.
I wonder if WPATH knows about this and whether they'd sue all those crazy-ass people? My endo doctor is an executive of WPATH and I'm going to send him this article. Someone needs to fight back, because this will get around so fast, nothing will stop them but a lawsuit. Thanks, Erin.
You are doing amazing work and this rapid turnaround makes a real difference. I’m part of those discussions routinely as a clinician and you were perfect with your characterization. These are providers being thorough. These are providers checking themselves for bias. These are providers wanting to do their very best for their patients. To see them used in this way makes me really sad/upset.
A very good high level overview of just how bunk this whole thing is.
I was curious so I did some analysis on the signatures to really take a look at the qualifications of the people signing this petition. Of the 2,308 signatures, only 2 that I could find had any qualifications relating to epidemiology and only 4 were sexologists.
Less than half of all signatories made any claim to medical expertise. The largest contingent of medical professionals who signed this document are Registered Nurses, which accounts for about 500 signatures. About 10% of all medical professionals who signed this are no longer practicing by their own admission, either "former" or "retired."
A few hundred people put in professional qualifications that are in no way related to medical care. Multiple lawyers, accountants, and academics understood the assignment and tried to pad this with official sounding acronyms.
Over 10% of all signatures proudly boasted associations with Anti-trans organizations.
One of the largest populations represented in the signatures were parents. 306 people labeled themselves "Concerned" either "concerned parent/mom/grandparent/etc" or just "concerned citizen/woman/librarian"
Funny enough, the number of detransitioners was less than 2%, because apparently no matter what community they're in, they are a significant minority there. You'd think that if there was such rampant medical malpractice going in in trans healthcare, that number would be way higher.
My favorite titles though were the people who didn't realize they were supposed to put in some sort of qualification and just put down "Mrs./Mr./Ms." Over 100 people did that, which is pretty great.
The overwhelming majority of people just signed their name as their title, though, demonstrating that there is literally no vetting going on for these signatures and anyone can sign it. ~2,000 signatures from medical professionals in a specific field is noteworthy. ~2,000 signatures from literally anyone with an internet connection really highlights how little support there is for this "movement."
It's infuriating that the noxious propaganda will almost certainly reach a broader audience than this debunking of it will, especially given the coordinated press releases you've caught them doing. Most of the people exposed to it probably won't even read it- they'll just be told about it by their favorite right-wing asshat and immediately accept it as Truth-With-A-Capital-T, as with every other load of bullshit that's oozed down the pipe. Evidence not required; facts not accepted.
But... at least you've given us something to clap back with, when it inevitably does pop up again. And again. And again.
Thank you for doing an analysis and exposing the constructed nonsense. I like the way you reference the "edge cases". So right wing to take an exception and make it the rule. I hope it brings comfort (and support) to those who look to providers to advocate for their health and wellness, including discussions with colleagues on more rare cases, in what is supposed to be a safe space for collaboration.
I used to respect Shellenberger because of his views on energy and nuclear power. Now I'm really disgusted with him, since he's decided to jump on the anti-trans hate bandwagon.
Excellent, excellent work. You are a treasure.
This reminds me of the equally-bogus "Climategate" "scandal" of 14 years ago. There too, so-called "leaked" documents used misrepresented, twisted, out-of-context quotes from emails among scientists dealing with the topic to claim some sort of conspiracy to HIDE THE TRUTH double exclamation point. The topic has changed; the deceit and lies of the reactionaries have not.
One other thing to note quickly, this in reference to the study of 366 patients that had 2 with major complications: Those 2 developed interoperatively, that is, they arose during the surgery and were dealt with at the time. I mention it because I expect most people think of complications arising post-surgery.
Again, terrific work. Take a bow. In fact, take several.
Get some rest Erin. Thank you for all your hard work.
omg this is amazing research. Thank you for teasing this apart. hope this gets some fair coverage.
Thank you for this amazing work, and for such a quick response to this outrageous propaganda. If a fraction of the journalists in the mainstream media were as diligent as you we probably wouldn't be in the middle of this horrific moral panic against queer folks to begin with.
Excellent job dear. This will be useful in fighting the resulting propaganda. I just wish more people were taught critical thinking. Too many will take it as gospel and claim that any defense is denial or a conspiracy. As a thesis, this report is a scandal itself, which would be drummed out of any university, possibly even leading to charges against the author.
I wonder if WPATH knows about this and whether they'd sue all those crazy-ass people? My endo doctor is an executive of WPATH and I'm going to send him this article. Someone needs to fight back, because this will get around so fast, nothing will stop them but a lawsuit. Thanks, Erin.
Erin, your work on stories like this is amazing, thank you so much! I feel we're going to be seeing more excellent fiskings of this document soon.
And yes, the Gish Gallop - that is so tiring.
You are doing amazing work and this rapid turnaround makes a real difference. I’m part of those discussions routinely as a clinician and you were perfect with your characterization. These are providers being thorough. These are providers checking themselves for bias. These are providers wanting to do their very best for their patients. To see them used in this way makes me really sad/upset.
Bless you for reading the whole thing, Erin. The gish gallop was too much for me, so I tapped out.
Anti-Trans organizations' lips are moving, ergo, they are lying.
A very good high level overview of just how bunk this whole thing is.
I was curious so I did some analysis on the signatures to really take a look at the qualifications of the people signing this petition. Of the 2,308 signatures, only 2 that I could find had any qualifications relating to epidemiology and only 4 were sexologists.
Less than half of all signatories made any claim to medical expertise. The largest contingent of medical professionals who signed this document are Registered Nurses, which accounts for about 500 signatures. About 10% of all medical professionals who signed this are no longer practicing by their own admission, either "former" or "retired."
A few hundred people put in professional qualifications that are in no way related to medical care. Multiple lawyers, accountants, and academics understood the assignment and tried to pad this with official sounding acronyms.
Over 10% of all signatures proudly boasted associations with Anti-trans organizations.
One of the largest populations represented in the signatures were parents. 306 people labeled themselves "Concerned" either "concerned parent/mom/grandparent/etc" or just "concerned citizen/woman/librarian"
Funny enough, the number of detransitioners was less than 2%, because apparently no matter what community they're in, they are a significant minority there. You'd think that if there was such rampant medical malpractice going in in trans healthcare, that number would be way higher.
My favorite titles though were the people who didn't realize they were supposed to put in some sort of qualification and just put down "Mrs./Mr./Ms." Over 100 people did that, which is pretty great.
The overwhelming majority of people just signed their name as their title, though, demonstrating that there is literally no vetting going on for these signatures and anyone can sign it. ~2,000 signatures from medical professionals in a specific field is noteworthy. ~2,000 signatures from literally anyone with an internet connection really highlights how little support there is for this "movement."
Good work on this.
So fast a reply and so needed- Thank you Erin. You’re a hero 🏳️⚧️
It's infuriating that the noxious propaganda will almost certainly reach a broader audience than this debunking of it will, especially given the coordinated press releases you've caught them doing. Most of the people exposed to it probably won't even read it- they'll just be told about it by their favorite right-wing asshat and immediately accept it as Truth-With-A-Capital-T, as with every other load of bullshit that's oozed down the pipe. Evidence not required; facts not accepted.
But... at least you've given us something to clap back with, when it inevitably does pop up again. And again. And again.
Thank you for doing an analysis and exposing the constructed nonsense. I like the way you reference the "edge cases". So right wing to take an exception and make it the rule. I hope it brings comfort (and support) to those who look to providers to advocate for their health and wellness, including discussions with colleagues on more rare cases, in what is supposed to be a safe space for collaboration.
Excellent work Erin.
In short, Climategate again.
The anti-science brigade always use the same “tricks” to “hide the decline” in their intellectual honesty.
I used to respect Shellenberger because of his views on energy and nuclear power. Now I'm really disgusted with him, since he's decided to jump on the anti-trans hate bandwagon.