7 Comments
User's avatar
Linden Jordan's avatar

Love the defenders of our right to be!!!

Talia Perkins's avatar

Thank you Baum.

I hope it works. The law is plainly unintelligent, likely to itself cause conflict, and is unenforceable.

Brianna Amore's avatar

The Idaho Legislature basically argued that ALL transgender people are inherently criminal, decided that EVERY trans person is criminally suspect, and that complaint absolutely DRIPS with anti-trans animus. And literally NONE of it has any basis in the truth whatsoever. It literally SCREAMS "trans panic" and the court should shut down this law IMMEDIATELY. It's a BLATANT violation of the Constitution and violates EVERY trans person's civil rights.

And the Idaho Legislature should be forced to prove that trans people are such a threat that this kind of draconian law is necessary. Because once in court, they will obviously fail since there is no statistical evidence that trans people are such a danger.

Joanne's avatar

I'm glad that the ACLU has finally decided to stand up for us. They have been silent about so many of the sweeping exclusions perpetrated by either our federal government, or various (usually republican) state legislatures.

Robin Elise's avatar

Sic ‘em. With prejudice.

Don Jackson's avatar

wtf is wrong with these people? thank you for the coverage, S.Baum.

Mike Gelt's avatar

Idaho’s HB 572, set to take effect in July, raises serious constitutional concerns under the 14th Amendment, particularly the Equal Protection Clause.

By targeting transgender individuals for differential treatment, the law singles out a specific group in a way that does not meet the constitutional requirement of equal protection under the law.

Beyond the legal issues, the rhetoric surrounding this legislation is deeply troubling.

These bigoted, racist lawmakers have characterized transgender people as inherently dangerous or criminal, claims that are not supported by credible evidence and contribute to stigma and discrimination rather than public safety.

Laws rooted in fear or bias rather than facts risk causing real harm while failing to address legitimate policy concerns.

For these reasons, HB 572 should face rigorous judicial review and, if found unconstitutional, be overturned.