12 Comments
User's avatar
CM's avatar

Do they not know the history of theater?? (eyeroll)

Mike Gelt's avatar

They are to stupid to know the history of theater and that at one time men played both sexes

Miranda Warren's avatar

The killing and the blood were OK but we have to draw the line at gender casting.

Jayna Sheats's avatar

I guess we're not staging "As You Like It" in Texas anymore...

But there are plays even before Shakespeare that could not comply with this incomprehensible lunacy. In 1671 “The Amorous Prince” was written (and staged by others) by a woman named Aphra Behn, which contains these lines:

“GUILLIAM Why, forsooth, what do you intend to pass for: a girl, or a boy?

CLORIS Why, what I seem to be. Will it not do?

GUILLIAM Yes, yes, it may do, but I know not what. I wish love would transmogrify me to a girl now.”

https://jaynasheats.substack.com/p/of-transgender-mice-and-transmogrified

errno's avatar

Better not tell them about Peter Pan or all of Shakespeare.

Mike Gelt's avatar

One more time, Texas finds itself in a mess of its own making! Whether it’s transgender rights, LGBTQ+ rights, access to birth control, or now taking steps to stop a play because of fears surrounding legislation that its own politicians passed and the governor signed, Texas continues to create problems that never needed to exist in the first place.

How much longer will the people of Texas tolerate this bullshit? These laws, driven by prejudice and discriminatory attitudes, are creating fear, restricting freedoms, and interfering with people's lives, families, and personal decisions.

This is one seriously F_ _ ked-up state when its leaders seem more interested in controlling people's lives than addressing the real issues facing their constituents.

November is the opportunity for Texans to change direction! I hope voters turn out in force, elect new leadership at the state level, and begin taking back their state. Texas deserves leaders who represent ALL its people, protect individual freedoms, and focus on making life better—not politicians who divide people and manufacture one controversy after another.

VEL's avatar

texas continues to perpetrate absolutely the most banal idiocy

Ruxine's avatar

Drag/cross-dressing is protected by the first amendment. We have freedom of expression, and thus the freedom to dress ourselves, without government imposed dress codes, and the freedom to say whatever the hell we want, including but not limited to reciting some lines in a school play. We are guaranteed that freedom by the very first thing they put in the damn constitution, so the whole concept of SB12 is hot garbage, violating Texans constitutional rights. The same people arguing against this harmless school play will scream bloody murder when they're not allowed their directly harmful hate speech.

Bee Ostrowsky's avatar

Audrey and Seymour are both trans-coded anyway!

Erin Kelly's avatar

Wait, so in their reasoning, they were okay with abusive relationship themes in the musical as long as the abusive relationship is depicted between a boy and a girl, but not when it's between two girls? WTF.

I think it's also worth noting, per Houston Public Media, that it's not at all clear in what way SB 12 (2025) would apply to this case. So whether they're saying 2023 or 2025, either way they're full of shit.

Gwen she/her's avatar

Proving that there is no bottom

Ffs

Bee Ostrowsky's avatar

Well, not yet, they have to prep first!