20 Comments
User's avatar
Kim Dunn's avatar

Sometimes news isn’t new, at least to our community.

Expand full comment
Anne's avatar

We are all not surprised. It is what we lived.

Expand full comment
Dee E Dressler's avatar

As one of the "elders" of our community (67) I want the let researchers know how lucky I feel to be alive. Even if I had succeeded in ending my life it certainly wouldn't have been recorded that it was because of the lack of gender affirming care, though that lack would certainly have been the cause. How many others did not make it?

Expand full comment
Trans Poetic's avatar

Thank you Erin, this is an incredibly well written article. There is absolutely no way that most mainstream media organizations would provide this much analysis into the actual scientific facts of this study.

I noticed in the study summary, the 30 kids that had already received puberty blockers and wondered how that would affect the study. Your clear analysis elucidates that the impact of suicide prevention was probably larger than in the study due to, as you note, that they likely had already received benefits of gender affirming care on their mental wellbeing.

Should we need studies like this? Absolutely not. But, they do help counter the horrific narrative that is circulating in the lie filled webs of internet propaganda machines. It's a no brainer that when you accept kids for who they are and who they tell you they are, they have better mental health.

Expand full comment
Talia Perkins's avatar

I'm shocked, SHOCKED!!!

Well, not that shocked.

I already knew that.

Somebody please mail it to Strangio!

Expand full comment
Celeste's avatar

Ughh the paper is behind a paywall. This is the kind of study that should be open access so that you can rub it in people’s faces. Especially those who authored the hhs report and RFK jr

Expand full comment
Kayla's avatar

This is dangerous information that must be hidden to protect the people! /s

Expand full comment
Kayla's avatar

I've seen a few studies over the years that come to the same conclusions. There are so many different factors that go into the decision of detransitioning such as family and social pressures. But even with that being considered, the detransition rate is still lower than the dissastifaction rate of Lasik.

Expand full comment
Lyla Caudle's avatar

If only some of the people wielding denial of care as a political tool cared about the reality. #daniellesmith

Expand full comment
Linda Howard's avatar

THANK YOU for providing this valuable, accurate information. We're up against SO much deliberate misinformation that I am doubly appreciative of any chance we have to set the record straight. And you're the only one I am aware of (other than legal organizations working on behalf of transgender people) who reports trans issues ACCURATELY.

Expand full comment
Ellen Adele Harper's avatar

Duh. It is good to see them back what we already know with peer reviewed science.

Expand full comment
Sue's avatar

Color me surprised.

Everyone who has a stake in this already knows this.

I’ve started posting the following quote every time I see someone question gender care:

“This message is so simple, yet it gets forgotten: the people living with the condition are the experts.” Michael J. Fox

Expand full comment
Sandra's avatar

Of course this is good news that we already knew to be the case, but does it really matter when they have just used the passport ban, and it having been green-lit by the supreme court , to essentially begin the process of defining trans people out of existence and eventually making it illegal to access federal benefits or even to exist in society? Granted, that’s not fully where we are today. But it’s where they want to go, and the passport ban has given them a huge jump start.

Expand full comment
Mike Gelt's avatar

While past studies have proven and shown that gender affirming care works and that this new study done someplace in the Midwest backs up that gender affirming care is positive I’m concerned with the lack of who authored this study.

Expand full comment
Talia Perkins's avatar

I can't download the whole paper, but here are the authors.

Luke R. Allen PhD, Cody G. Dodd PhD, Christine N. Moser PsyD, Michelle M. Knoll MD

Expand full comment
Mike Gelt's avatar

Thank you

Expand full comment
C.W. Hahn's avatar

Maybe if we didn’t live in an authoritarian regime where intellectualism, scientific research and freedom of choice were suppressed, the Midwest clinic would have been able to identify itself without fear of retribution.

Expand full comment
Mike Gelt's avatar

Yes that’s true but not knowing the clinic or the authorship our opponents will say it’s fake. It only gives our opponents another way to push their BS

Expand full comment
Talia Perkins's avatar

The paper is readily available to researchers. One way or another the "The Journal of Pediatrics" needs to be paid.

Expand full comment
C.W. Hahn's avatar

I totally agree. But we live in very strange times. Our opponents wouldn’t believe the study results no matter who did the research. Sadly. 😞

Expand full comment