Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Celeste's avatar

This is the kind of energy we need.

Talia Perkins's avatar

I love to hear it. Thank you for the reporting.

I see a trap to this we should avoid and want not to exploit even temporarily.

The word testosterone did not come up.

For all athletes desiring to participate in girl's or women's categories, a past atypically high effective testosterone blood level is an athletic advantage over other female athletes whose T blood levels are more female typical.

While I can certainly believe that for youth or for some sports, less than the two years on effective HRT is required for "fairness" ( T suppression is the relevant part ), like what the IOC required from 2004 to 2018, is a good starting point for medically sane policy -- for all athletes wanting to participate in women's categories, whether transgender or cisgender.

We are not required to like the fact that male typical T levels provide an advantage which is readily apparent in most sports, and that anabolic steroid supplementation is prohibited in sports generally for like reason.

But it is so.

Recent overviews demonstrating MtF athletes have no advantage, but may be at a slight disadvantage compared to cisgender athletes, are overviews of data from athletes who were on T suppression.

For MtF athletes who avoid a masculine puberty starting with the start of Tanner 2, no such rules have any applicability. For those of us who underwent a typical masculine puberty, they have full applicability.

Everyone wants to include nuance, from the standpoint of biology -- to a first order and likely second order of things -- that's the nuance.

25 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?