71% Of People Say Government Should Not Intervene In Trans Youth Care, New SC Poll Says
In a major poll of South Carolina registered voters, 71% of South Carolina voters, including a majority of Republicans, believe the government should stay out of trans youth care.
A new poll conducted by Mason Dixon Polling & Strategy among registered voters in South Carolina has revealed that an overwhelming majority believes the government should not intervene in medical decisions regarding gender-affirming care for transgender youth, provided parents are involved in those decisions. Even a majority of Republicans oppose government intervention in the new poll. These findings are noteworthy given South Carolina's heavily Republican legislature and its tendency to vote predominantly for Republicans in national elections. With this new poll, a clearer picture is emerging regarding the general public's perception of bills targeting trans youth; South Carolina could enact such a bill imminently.
The poll, surveying registered voters in South Carolina, posed the question: "If parents are already involved in the decision-making process, do you believe the government should or should not intervene in LGBTQ gender-affirming health care decisions concerning individuals under the age of 18?" It found that 71% of the state's registered voters believe the government should not intervene in such gender-affirming health care decisions. Opposition to government intervention was substantial across all political affiliations: 67% of Republicans, 70% of independents, and 80% of Democrats were opposed.
You can see the results here:
South Carolina remains one of the few Republican-controlled states that has not enacted a ban on gender-affirming care for transgender youth. House Bill 4624, currently under consideration by state legislatures, seeks to prohibit such care for transgender youth, mandate that teachers disclose transgender students' identities, and deny Medicaid coverage for gender-affirming procedures up to the age of 26 years old, marking a significant intrusion into the care of adult transgender individuals. The debate surrounding this bill has been intense, highlighted by a senior legislator's claim that "young people" are using litter boxes in classrooms, "identifying as cats," and "answering yes or no with a meow." These assertions have been consistently debunked as a hoax spread by extremist accounts, including Libs of TikTok.
The latest poll aligns with other recent surveys in primarily Republican states and national polls, offering a nuanced perspective on the general public's views on transgender care. While some polls have been published indicating opposition to transgender care for youth, others suggest a lack of strong feelings on the issue, with it not being a high priority for most people. For example, only 1% of respondents in a Fox News poll identified trans/woke issues as a top policy priority.
The picture becomes significantly clearer, though, when it comes to government intervention into care that a parent approves of. According to a recent Data For Progress poll, 76% of participants believe decisions regarding transgender care for youth should be made by parents or doctors. In Kentucky, 71% opposed a law that would permit the state to override parents' decisions to secure gender-affirming care for their transgender teenagers. A Grinnell College poll similarly revealed that a significant majority opposes bans on transgender care with parental consent. Additionally, a Pathfinder poll last month found that a majority of voters would be motivated to oppose political candidates who frequently discuss restricting access to healthcare and sports for transgender youth.
The notion that the general public disapproves of anti-trans legislation is further supported by electoral outcomes where transgender issues have been a focal point. In the 2023 school board elections, 70% of Moms For Liberty and 1776 Project candidates, who campaigned extensively on anti-trans student policies, were defeated across the United States. Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear vetoed a gender-affirming care ban in the state. Despite significant advertising expenditures targeting him during the reelection campaign over this veto, he secured victory by a larger margin than in his initial campaign. In 2023, the Virginia Legislature, the Arizona Governor’s Race, the Michigan legislature in 2022, the Wisconsin Supreme Court election, and the Walker-Warnock Senate race were all significantly influenced by anti-trans political narratives; Democrats were victorious in each of these contests.
Despite public sentiment, Republicans have continued to advance anti-trans legislation throughout the United States. In South Carolina, some Republican legislators seem determined to advocate for a comprehensive ban on transgender care for youth and to implement a Medicaid ban for individuals under 26, disregarding polling data and previous election results. For these lawmakers, the 2024 elections will be particularly significant if polling on this issue reflects accurate public opinion.
Sure would be nice if some of those Republicans who say they oppose what their Republican politicians are doing would express their dissatisfaction by 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘷𝘰𝘵𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮. Unfortunately, the little (R) next to the name is more important to many voters than a candidate's voting record or platform- they'd vote for that letter, party loyalty above all reason, even if the candidate were campaigning to have everyone who voted for them fed feet-first into a woodchipper.
I don't believe in polls, because they never say what the sample-sizes are and it's never been very accurate. BUT, it's still a good sign that people may be getting tired of what they're seeing their comrades do in the government.
Listen, I was on a veteran's Discord server earlier, looking for a Live game to watch. These guys were talking about trans people like they weren't listening to that conversation too. Well, I was. I keep hearing them say they don't care what people do, but don't shove it down their throats. This is going on everywhere, folks; not just that server.
Exactly how are any of us doing that? No, what's being shoved down throats is their utter disdain for us, including that conversation. That's what is being shoved down OUR throats. They were talking out of both sides of their neck. They don't care, but they do care. SMFH No doubt in my mind, they'd vote against us from this perceived notion that trans people are shoving who they are down their throats. If that was true, I'd be out around there, shoving myself down their throats. Such a stupid, ignorant, and dumb argument.